Routing protocols select the “best path” using different metrics:
- RIP uses a hop count
- OSPF uses cost (based on interface bandwidth)
- EIGRP uses a composite metric which looks at the bandwidth, delay, load, and reliability on an interface.
Dynamic values in routing protocols like EIGRP’s load and reliability never took off. We want our networks to be safe and predictable so the general recommendation with EIGRP is to stick to static values like bandwidth and delay.
Still, the idea behind routing based on dynamic values is interesting so Cisco created Optimized Edge Routing (OER). OER is not a routing protocol, it requires existing routing but is able to influence your routing by injecting routes. It’s able to select different paths in the network and does this on a per-prefix level. OER looks at different criteria like packet loss, response times, path availability, and traffic load.
OER is a good step forward but it’s not enough, it does “prefix based route optimization” but optimization per prefix is not good enough in today’s world. Nowadays, it’s all about “application based optimization”. Performance Routing (PfR) is very similar to OER but is able to optimize our routing based on application requirements. Technically, OER and PfR are 95% the same but Cisco rebranded OER to PfR.
PfR uses different “phases”, these are the same as the OER phases so I will just explain them in a nutshell here:
- Profile/Learning: in a typical network, there are a lot of flows and we can’t optimize everything. PfR learns about flows with high throughput and/or delay. A flow that PfR wants to optimize is called a traffic-class. The list with all traffic classes is called the monitored traffic-classes (MTC) list.
- Measure: collect and calculate performance metrics for the traffic-classes we learned in the profile/learning phase.
- Apply policy: compare the performance metrics for a traffic-class against certain thresholds to see if a traffic class is in-policy or out-of-policy.
- Control/Enforce: influence our traffic by injecting routes or by using policy-based routing (PBR).
- Verify: after making our changes, we keep monitoring the traffic-class to verify performance and make adjustments if needed.
There are two device roles in PfR:
- Master controller (MC): this is where the magic happens. The MC communicates with all border routers, monitors everything, and does the calculations.
- Border router (BR): a border router is a router that has one or more interfaces connected to external networks. The BR reports performance metrics to the MC and on this router we implement policies.
The MC doesn’t have to be in the forwarding path, it can be any router in your network. You can also configure the MC and BR on a single router.
PfR uses three interface types:
- Internal: we use these interfaces to connect to the internal network.
- External: we use these interfaces to connect to external networks. You need at least two external interfaces to make PfR work.
- Local: this is the source interface we use to communicate between the MC and BRs. We often use loopback interfaces for this.
In the remaining of this lesson, I’ll show you how to configure PfR on Cisco IOS routers.
We’ll use the following topology:
Let me explain what we have:
- H1 is a traffic generator that sends traffic to the ISP router loopback interfaces.
- MC, BR1, and BR2 run iBGP.
- MC is our master controller.
- BR1 and BR2 are border routers.
- Between AS 1 and AS 2 we run eBGP.
We’ll configure PfR so that it automatically learns about the traffic from H1 to ISP1 and optimize it. It will do this by influencing our BGP routing.
Want to take a look for yourself? Here you will find the startup configuration of each device.
hostname BR1 ! key chain PFR key 1 key-string NETWORKLESSONS ! interface Loopback0 ip address 22.214.171.124 255.255.255.255 ! interface GigabitEthernet2 ip address 192.168.123.2 255.255.255.0 no mop enabled no mop sysid ! interface GigabitEthernet3 ip address 192.168.24.2 255.255.255.0 load-interval 30 ! router ospf 1 network 126.96.36.199 0.0.0.0 area 0 network 192.168.123.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 ! router bgp 1 network 192.168.1.0 network 192.168.123.0 neighbor 188.8.131.52 remote-as 1 neighbor 184.108.40.206 update-source Loopback0 neighbor 220.127.116.11 next-hop-self neighbor 18.104.22.168 remote-as 1 neighbor 22.214.171.124 update-source Loopback0 neighbor 192.168.24.4 remote-as 2 ! end
hostname BR2 ! key chain PFR key 1 key-string NETWORKLESSONS ! interface Loopback0 ip address 126.96.36.199 255.255.255.255 ! interface GigabitEthernet2 ip address 192.168.123.3 255.255.255.0 ! interface GigabitEthernet3 ip address 192.168.34.3 255.255.255.0 ! router ospf 1 network 188.8.131.52 0.0.0.0 area 0 network 192.168.123.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 ! router bgp 1 network 192.168.1.0 network 192.168.123.0 neighbor 184.108.40.206 remote-as 1 neighbor 220.127.116.11 update-source Loopback0 neighbor 18.104.22.168 next-hop-self neighbor 22.214.171.124 remote-as 1 neighbor 126.96.36.199 update-source Loopback0 neighbor 192.168.34.4 remote-as 2 ! end
hostname H1 ! interface GigabitEthernet2 ip address 192.168.1.100 255.255.255.0 ! ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1 ! end
hostname ISP1 ! interface Loopback1 ip address 10.4.4.1 255.255.255.255 ! interface Loopback2 ip address 10.4.4.2 255.255.255.255 ! interface Loopback3 ip address 10.40.40.3 255.255.255.255 ! interface Loopback4 ip address 10.40.40.4 255.255.255.255 ! interface GigabitEthernet2 ip address 192.168.24.4 255.255.255.0 ! interface GigabitEthernet3 ip address 192.168.34.4 255.255.255.0 ! router bgp 2 network 10.0.0.0 neighbor 192.168.24.2 remote-as 1 neighbor 192.168.34.3 remote-as 1 ! ip route 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 Null0 ! end
hostname MC ! key chain PFR key 1 key-string NETWORKLESSONS ! interface Loopback0 ip address 188.8.131.52 255.255.255.255 ! interface GigabitEthernet2 ip address 192.168.123.1 255.255.255.0 ! interface GigabitEthernet3 ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 ! router ospf 1 network 184.108.40.206 0.0.0.0 area 0 network 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 network 192.168.123.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 ! router bgp 1 network 192.168.1.0 neighbor 220.127.116.11 remote-as 1 neighbor 18.104.22.168 update-source Loopback0 neighbor 22.214.171.124 remote-as 1 neighbor 126.96.36.199 update-source Loopback0 ! end
Default BGP Routing
Let’s take a look at our current routing. Here’s the BGP table of our MC:
MC#show ip bgp BGP table version is 4, local router ID is 188.8.131.52 Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal, r RIB-failure, S Stale, m multipath, b backup-path, f RT-Filter, x best-external, a additional-path, c RIB-compressed, t secondary path, Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete RPKI validation codes: V valid, I invalid, N Not found Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path * i 10.0.0.0 184.108.40.206 0 100 0 2 i *>i 220.127.116.11 0 100 0 2 i * i 192.168.1.0 18.104.22.168 2 100 0 i * i 22.214.171.124 2 100 0 i *> 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i r i 192.168.123.0 126.96.36.199 0 100 0 i r>i 188.8.131.52 0 100 0 i
We see two entries for the 10.0.0.0/8 network and iBGP uses BR1 as the exit point. We can also check this in the routing table:
MC#show ip route bgp 10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 3 subnets, 3 masks B 10.0.0.0/8 [200/0] via 184.108.40.206, 16:35:51
Let’s also check our border routers:
BR1#show ip bgp Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path * i 10.0.0.0 192.168.34.4 0 100 0 2 i *> 192.168.24.4 0 0 2 i * i 192.168.1.0 220.127.116.11 0 100 0 i * i 192.168.123.1 2 100 0 i *> 192.168.123.1 2 32768 i * i 192.168.123.0 18.104.22.168 0 100 0 i *> 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i
BR1#show ip route bgp 10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 3 subnets, 3 masks B 10.0.0.0/8 [20/0] via 192.168.24.4, 16:36:52
Above, we see that BR1 uses its eBGP entry. Here’s BR2:
BR2#show ip bgp Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path * i 10.0.0.0 192.168.24.4 0 100 0 2 i *> 192.168.34.4 0 0 2 i * i 192.168.1.0 22.214.171.124 0 100 0 i * i 192.168.123.1 2 100 0 i *> 192.168.123.1 2 32768 i * i 192.168.123.0 126.96.36.199 0 100 0 i *> 0.0.0.0 0 32768 i
BR2#show ip route bgp 10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 3 subnets, 3 masks B 10.0.0.0/8 [20/0] via 192.168.34.4, 16:37:16
BR2 has also installed its eBGP route. Right now, we only have a 10.0.0.0/8 route and iBGP uses BR1 as the exit point to reach AS 2. Wouldn’t it be nice if we can also use BR2 for some traffic?
Let’s configure Performance Routing. On our interfaces, we need to set the correct bandwidth since this is something PfR takes into account when selecting an exit path. I also change the load-interval to thirty seconds (default value is five minutes) so we calculate the interface statistics more often:
BR1(config)#interface GigabitEthernet3 BR1(config-if)#bandwidth 128 BR1(config-if)#load-interval 30
BR2(config)#interface GigabitEthernet3 BR2(config-if)#bandwidth 256 BR1(config-if)#load-interval 30
PfR requires a keychain for authentication so let’s add one on the MC and BCs:
MC, BR1 & BR2 (config)#key chain PFR (config-keychain)#key 1 (config-keychain-key)#key-string NETWORKLESSONS
Let’s configure the master controller. This is where I add my border routers and set the correct interfaces:
MC(config)#pfr master MC(config-pfr-mc)#border 188.8.131.52 key-chain PFR MC(config-pfr-mc-br)#interface GigabitEthernet2 internal MC(config-pfr-mc-br)#interface GigabitEthernet3 external MC(config-pfr-mc)#border 184.108.40.206 key-chain PFR MC(config-pfr-mc-br)#interface GigabitEthernet2 internal MC(config-pfr-mc-br)#interface GigabitEthernet3 external
PfR can be pretty slow, especially in a lab. To speed things up, I tune some of the default timers:
MC(config)#pfr master MC(config-oer-mc)#holddown 90 MC(config-oer-mc)#backoff 90 180 90 MC(config-pfr-mc)#learn MC(config-pfr-mc-learn)#periodic-interval 1 MC(config-pfr-mc-learn)#monitor-period 1
Pfr can produce some useful logging messages on the console so I like to enable it:
MC(config)#pfr master MC(config-pfr-mc)#logging
This completes the configuration of the master controller. The configuration of the border routers is pretty straight-forward: