We're Sorry, Full Content Access is for Members Only...

If you like to keep on reading, Become a Member Now! Here is why:

  • Learn any CCNA, CCNP and CCIE R&S Topic. Explained As Simple As Possible.
  • Try for Just $1. The Best Dollar You've Ever Spent on Your Cisco Career!
  • Full Access to our 651 Lessons. More Lessons Added Every Week!
  • Content created by Rene Molenaar (CCIE #41726)

451 Sign Ups in the last 30 days

satisfaction-guaranteed
100% Satisfaction Guaranteed!
You may cancel your monthly membership at any time.
No Questions Asked!

Tags: , , , ,


Forum Replies

  1. Hi, Rene. Thanks for info. What if you add note about pagp silent/non-silent submode? Thanks.

  2. Hello Rene,

    port-channel load-balance {dst-ip | dst-mac | src-dst-ip | src-dst-mac | src-ip | src-mac}

    could you please explain what is the function of {dst-ip | dst-mac | src-dst-ip | src-dst-mac | src-ip | src-mac} and how load is converting in each link based on load balancing ?

  3. Hi Hans,

    The default is src mac based load balancing.

    From SW1’s perspective this is a great choice as each computer has a different MAC address. Traffic from the computers will be load balanced when it is sent from SW1 to SW2.

    From SW2 to SW1, it’s another story. The MAC address of the router remains the same so using src mac based load balancing is not a good idea. All traffic will be sent using the same physical interface. It’s better to change it to dst mac address load balancing since the destination MAC address will be one of the four computers.

    The same

    ... Continue reading in our forum

  4. I dont think there is a difference between the two in regards to pros and cons. The only advantage I could see is that PAgP might be “quicker” to configure since the default protocol used for etherchannel is PAgP on Cisco equipment. After some googling there was no clear advantage I seen. One advantage of both LACP and PAgP is they help prevent loops manual etherchannel configurations do not allow for this. I hope this was helpful!

  5. Thank you very much Laz for this intuitive explanation

73 more replies! Ask a question or join the discussion by visiting our Community Forum