We're Sorry, Full Content Access is for Members Only...

If you like to keep on reading, Become a Member Now! Here is why:

  • Learn any CCNA, CCNP and CCIE R&S Topic. Explained As Simple As Possible.
  • Try for Just $1. The Best Dollar You've Ever Spent on Your Cisco Career!
  • Full Access to our 651 Lessons. More Lessons Added Every Week!
  • Content created by Rene Molenaar (CCIE #41726)

426 Sign Ups in the last 30 days

100% Satisfaction Guaranteed!
You may cancel your monthly membership at any time.
No Questions Asked!


Forum Replies

  1. While labbing the same topology, i found something diff from ur configuration. Here it is:

    1. “ip pim bidir-enable” should be enable on R4 & R5 as well.
    2. “ip pim rp-address bidir” should be configured on R4 & R5 as well.

    Then only i am getting the same output as u mention in your most. Let me know i have done mistakes anywhere ya i understood it wrongly.

  2. Hi Rene,

    I do not understand based on the last output shown below
    (Now we see FastEthenet0/0 as the Bidir-Upstream interface and FastEthernet0/1 in the outgoing list. This is something different than what you have seen before right?)

    Isn’t your earlier output already showing FastEthenet0/0 as the Bidir-Upstream interface and FastEthernet0/1 in the outgoing list?

    R3#show ip mroute    
    (*,, 00:09:39/00:03:10, RP, flags: BC
      **Bidir-Upstream: FastEthernet0/0**, RPF nbr
      **Outgoing interface list:**
    ... Continue reading in our forum

  3. Earlier output below:

    R3#show ip mroute
    IP Multicast Routing Table
    Flags: D - Dense, S - Sparse, B - Bidir Group, s - SSM Group, C - Connected,
           L - Local, P - Pruned, R - RP-bit set, F - Register flag,
           T - SPT-bit set, J - Join SPT, M - MSDP created entry,
           X - Proxy Join Timer Running, A - Candidate for MSDP Advertisement,
           U - URD, I - Received Source Specific Host Report,
           Z - Multicast Tunnel, z - MDT-data group sender,
           Y - Joined MDT-data group, y - Sending to MDT-data group
    Outgoing interface flags: H - Har
    ... Continue reading in our forum

  4. Hello Kenneth

    You are correct in that the output was the same as that shown earlier in the lab. Of course, this is indeed different from the output shown in R2 which is shown just previously. I will ask Rene to clarify his statement.

    Thanks for the heads up!


  5. Hey System,

    He is using R4 and R5 as “host” on the network, not multicast routers, that is why he didn’t enable any directional commands on them and why you don’t need them.

11 more replies! Ask a question or join the discussion by visiting our Community Forum