We're Sorry, Full Content Access is for Members Only...

If you like to keep on reading, Become a Member Now! Here is why:

  • Learn any CCNA, CCNP and CCIE R&S Topic. Explained As Simple As Possible.
  • Try for Just $1. The Best Dollar You've Ever Spent on Your Cisco Career!
  • Full Access to our 651 Lessons. More Lessons Added Every Week!
  • Content created by Rene Molenaar (CCIE #41726)

470 Sign Ups in the last 30 days

100% Satisfaction Guaranteed!
You may cancel your monthly membership at any time.
No Questions Asked!

Tags: ,

Forum Replies

  1. Hello Laz,
    One quick question. So I can set the bandwidth under the GIG interface to 100 Mb to shrink the traffic flow or I can create a class -map as below.

    class-map SHAPING
     match any
    Policy-map SHAPING_100Mb
     class SHAPING
       shape average percent 10
    inter gigabitEthernet 1/0
     service-policy output SHAPING_100Mb

    What is the functional difference between these two configurations?

    Another thing. what is the difference between changing the bandwidth vs speed under an interface?

    Thank you so much.

  2. Rene,

    Apparently the attributes returned by Radius will be assigned automatically to PPPoE sessions once the policy is not configured directly on any interfaces.

    R1(config)#policy-map SHAPE_AVERAGE
    R1(config-pmap)#class IPERF
    R1(config-pmap-c)#shape average 64000
    Radius attribute:
    sub-qos-policy-in = SHAPE_AVERAGE


  3. @ReneMolenaar @lagapides @andrew Hi. I need to simulate WAN environment in lab. Precisely: need to increase delay between to max (200 ms let’s say) from what I have now 1/2 ms!!! Is this possible anyway between Cisco routers without using external simulator?

41 more replies! Ask a question or join the discussion by visiting our Community Forum