We're Sorry, Full Content Access is for Members Only...

If you like to keep on reading, Become a Member Now! Here is Why:

  • Learn any CCNA, CCNP and CCIE R&S Topic. Explained As Simple As Possible.
  • Try for Just $1. The Best Dollar You've Ever Spent on Your Cisco Career!
  • Full Access to our 619 Lessons. More Lessons Added Every Week!
  • Content created by Rene Molenaar (CCIE #41726)

 

411 New Members signed up the last 30 days!

satisfaction-guaranteed

100% Satisfaction Guaranteed!
You may cancel your monthly membership at any time.
No Questions Asked!

Tags: ,


Forum Replies

  1. Hello Everyone,
    I have a question regarding the " Static VRF routes" defined under the MP-BGP section. I believe they should look like this:

    ISP(config)#ip route vrf BLUE 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 192.168.12.1
    ISP(config)#ip route vrf RED 3.3.3.3 255.255.255.255 192.168.23.3
    

    Instead of:

    ISP(config)#ip route vrf RED 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 192.168.12.1
    ISP(config)#ip route vrf BLUE 3.3.3.3 255.255.255.255 192.168.23.3
    

    Am I missing something or this is just a typo?

    Many thanks!

  2. do you can ping 3.3.3.3 source 1.1.1.1 on router Red1 ? i can not do that

  3. Hello Jose

    Yes, you are correct. Rene states that:

    Now we can worry about getting the routes into each other’s VRF. For each VRF, I will create a static route that points to the loopback 0 interface of the other VRF:

    The commands are correct in the configurations however, so yes, it should be as you suggest. I will let @ReneMolenaar know.

    Thanks for catching that!

    Laz

  4. Hello Khuat Quang N

    There is a typo in the commands in the lesson, so this might be why you’re not able to ping. Take a look at the previous post above. Look at the configurations of each of the routers in the lesson in order to see the correct configuration commands.

    I hope this has been helpful!

    Laz

  5. You are absolutely correct, not sure how I ended up with that in the configs as the show output does show the correct output. It has been fixed.

2 more replies! Ask a question or join the discussion by visiting our Community Forum