We're Sorry, Full Content Access is for Members Only...

If you like to keep on reading, Become a Member Now! Here is Why:

  • Learn any CCNA, CCNP and CCIE R&S Topic. Explained As Simple As Possible.
  • Try for Just $1. The Best Dollar You've Ever Spent on Your Cisco Career!
  • Full Access to our 637 Lessons. More Lessons Added Every Week!
  • Content created by Rene Molenaar (CCIE #41726)

 

367 New Members signed up the last 30 days!

satisfaction-guaranteed

100% Satisfaction Guaranteed!
You may cancel your monthly membership at any time.
No Questions Asked!


Forum Replies

  1. Probably I’ve understood it, since I haven’t watched your video before asking the question. Let me try: There is no permanent problem between Router 1 and his neighbors, since this was just an example from you. Moreover there still could be a problem with a query between Router 3 and Router 2 (theres none in your example but it could happen). Nevertheless I barely unterstand the “congestion” part?!

  2. great explanation ,thank you.

  3. Hi Paul,
    You generally have it right. The short answer is after 90 seconds, an SIA-Query is sent.

    The longer answer:

    Each router manages its own SIA Query and SIA Query Response management. This means that as soon as each router has put a route in Active (regardless of whether the router in question was the actual first router to start the process) and has sent a Query to its neighbors, that router also starts a timer. At 90 seconds, for each neighbor from which it has not received a reply, it will send an SIA Query to check on the status of the original que

    ... Continue reading in our forum

  4. Hi Ananth Maruti,

    If there is more than one feasible successor, then surely it will be listed in the topology table of EIGRP. Please remember the forumla: to have a feasible successor then the Advertised distance of feasible successor should be less than the Feasible distance of successor.

    For the 2nd part of your question, if the network in converged than the calculation of successor & feasible successor(s) is already done. In this case, if a successor route goes down, then the feasible successor takes over. In case the topology table had another feasible succ

    ... Continue reading in our forum

  5. Thanks for such a good brief .Can we have a lab where we can test it.

40 more replies! Ask a question or join the discussion by visiting our Community Forum