EIGRP uses the bandwidth, delay, reliability, load and K values to calculate a composite cost metric. The problem with this metric is that it doesn’t scale for high bandwidth interfaces. The composite cost metric is calculated like this:

`EIGRP composite cost metric = 256*((K1*Scaled Bandwidth) + (K2*Scaled Bandwidth)/(256 – Load) + (K3*Scaled Delay)*(K5/(Reliability + K4)))`

In the formula above, you can see that the bandwidth is scaled. It’s done with the following formula:

`Scaled bandwidth = (10`^{7}/minimum bandwidth (Bw) in kilobits per second)

The delay is also scaled, using this formula:

`Scaled Delay = (Delay/10)`

By default, only K1 and K3 are enabled, only bandwidth and delay are used. This means the composite cost metric can be simplified to the following formula:

`EIGRP composite cost metric = 256*(Scaled Bandwidth + Scaled Delay)`

The scaled bandwidth formula is unable to differentiate between anything faster than 10 GigabitEthernet. The lowest delay that we can configure is 10 microseconds, that’s the delay GigabitEthernet interfaces offer. Anything above GigabitEthernet will also have a delay of 10 microseconds.

Here are some examples to help you understand this:

- GigabitEthernet:
- Scaled bandwidth: 10000000 / 1000000 = 10
- Scaled delay: 10 / 10 = 1
- Composite metric: 10 + 1 * 256 = 2816

- 10 GigabitEthernet:
- Scaled bandwidth: 10000000 / 10000000 = 1
- Scaled delay: 10 / 10 = 1
- Composite metric: 1 + 1 * 256 = 512

- 11 GigabitEthernet:
- Scaled bandwidth: 10000000 / 11000000 = 0.9 (rounded to 0)
- Scaled delay: 10 / 10 = 1
- Composite metric: 0 + 1 * 256 = 256

- 20 GigabitEthernet:
- Scaled bandwidth: 10000000 / 20000000 = 0.5 (rounded to 0)
- Scaled delay: 10 / 10 = 1
- Composite metric: 0 + 1 * 256 = 256

- 40 GigabitEthernet:
- Scaled bandwidth: 10000000 / 40000000 = 0.25 (rounded to 0)
- Scaled delay: 10 / 10 = 1
- Composite metric: 0 + 1 * 256 = 256

Above, you can see that the scaled bandwidth of anything higher than 10 GigabitEthernet has a value that is below one and is rounded down to zero. The delay has a value of one for GigabitEthernet or faster interfaces.

Any interface above 10 GigabitEthernet will always have a composite cost metric of 256. To EIGRP, there is no difference between anything above 10 GigabitEthernet or 40 GigabitEthernet interfaces and this might cause undesirable equal-cost load balancing in your network.

The metric and its formulas as explained above is called the **EIGRP classic metrics**. To solve this problem, EIGRP supports **wide metrics **which uses **64-bit** values instead of the 32-bit values that EIGRP classics metric uses. EIGRP wide metrics supports interfaces up to 4.2 terabits and uses a different composite cost metric formula. It has the following components:

- Throughput: this is the bandwidth, it uses a new scaled bandwidth formula.
- Latency: this is the delay, in picoseconds. 1000000000 picoseconds = 1 millisecond. It also uses a new latency scaling formula.
- Reliability: the same as with EIGRP classic metrics.
- Load: the same as with EIGRP classic metrics.
- MTU: the same as with EIGRP classic metrics.
- Hop Count: the same as with EIGRP classic metrics.
- Extended Metrics: these are currently not used but reserved for future extensions. There are three extended metrics as of this moment:
- Jitter
- Energy
- Quiescent Energy

To add these extended metrics to the composite metric, a new K value was introduced called **K6**.

Let’s take a look at the wide metrics composite metric formula:

Hello Mallik,

Although I am not Rene, I hope I can help you out. From what I understand vector metrics are the metrics that in total make up the composite metric. For example Bandwidth, Delay, Load, Reliability, and MTU are the Vector Metrics. Together they are used in a formula to find the composite metric. This composite metric is used by EIGRP to decide the best paths to insert into the topology and routing table.

Below is a quote and link to a Cisco article that you might find helpful.

"EIGRP Composite Cost Metrics

The Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Prot

... Continue reading in our forumMany thanks Scott, well explained…appreciate your help.

Good day Network Lessons Team!

I was investigating the formula of calculating short composite metric with the relic components from IGRP: Load, along with the Reliability.

A)

256*((K1

Scaled Bandwidth) + (K2Scaled Bandwidth)/(256 – Load) + (K3Scaled Delay)(K5/(Reliability + K4)))I saw a lot of sources where we can find the same formula A , but there is another one B (the last parameter (K5/(Reliability + K4) is out of parentheses)

B)

256 * [K1

Scaled Bandwidth + K2Scaled Bandwidth/(256 – Load) + K3*Scaled Delay] * K5/(Reliability + K4)They give us different res

... Continue reading in our forumHello again Evgeny

I found the reference in the Cert guide and started reading, and I realized that the two formulas are actually the same. This is because, for multiplication, the order of operations doesn’t matter. For example, if you have

256 * (a+b+c) * dthis is exactly the same as

256 * [(a+b+c) * d]which is also exactly the same as

(256a + 256b + 256c) * dYou can replace

(K1Scaled Bandwidth)(K2Scaled Bandwidth)/(256 – Load)(K3Scaled Delay)(K5/(Reliability + K4))and you have the same thing. So it seems that both

... Continue reading in our forumThank you for clarifying!