We're Sorry, Full Content Access is for Members Only...

If you like to keep on reading, Become a Member Now! Here is why:

  • Learn any CCNA, CCNP and CCIE R&S Topic. Explained As Simple As Possible.
  • Try for Just $1. The Best Dollar You've Ever Spent on Your Cisco Career!
  • Full Access to our 651 Lessons. More Lessons Added Every Week!
  • Content created by Rene Molenaar (CCIE #41726)

461 Sign Ups in the last 30 days

100% Satisfaction Guaranteed!
You may cancel your monthly membership at any time.
No Questions Asked!

Forum Replies

  1. Is there any reason in a real world deployment you might not want to disable BW? It seems more deterministic to use just BW.

  2. Hi William,

    As Rene has mentioned in the lesson, Cisco by default has Bandwidth and delay enabled while load and reliability are disabled as they change dynamically and Cisco recommended us to not enable them.

    So in other term, Cisco wanted to say keep BW and delay only active. In the real world, I don’t see any reason to disable BW & delay. In case you want to disable any of them then it is better to disable the delay and keep the bandwidth enabled because the delay is calculated based on the sum of delays in the path as per the below formula’s

    Metric = band

    ... Continue reading in our forum

  3. Hi William,
    The calculation is sum of all the delays and the lowest bandwidth.
    So if you only enable the bandwidth then essentially the path length is not taken into consideration.
    Usually you would prefer a shortest path if all the bandwidths are the same.


  4. Hi Stefanio,

    As weird as it sounds, that’s exactly what they intend with energy yes :smile:

    Here’s an excerpt from RFC 7868:

    https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7868#page-41 Energy

    Use of Energy-based Path Selection results in paths with the lowest
    energy usage being selected in a loop-free and deterministic manner.
    The amount of energy used is accumulative and has results in a higher
    aggregate metric than those having lower energy.

    Presently, EIGRP does not report energy usage, and as such the
    default value will be zero (0).

    On the Cisco site, you can find thi

    ... Continue reading in our forum

  5. Hello,
    I am going to use the below topology as a reference for my question.


    I am trying to manipulate EIGRP path by changing the interface delay on ROUTER-1.
    By default, this is how everything looks like.



    Then I increased the interface delay and now

    ... Continue reading in our forum

2 more replies! Ask a question or join the discussion by visiting our Community Forum