We're Sorry, Full Content Access is for Members Only...

If you like to keep on reading, Become a Member Now! Here is Why:

  • Learn any CCNA, CCNP and CCIE R&S Topic. Explained As Simple As Possible.
  • Try for Just $1. The Best Dollar You've Ever Spent on Your Cisco Career!
  • Full Access to our 631 Lessons. More Lessons Added Every Week!
  • Content created by Rene Molenaar (CCIE #41726)

 

410 New Members signed up the last 30 days!

satisfaction-guaranteed

100% Satisfaction Guaranteed!
You may cancel your monthly membership at any time.
No Questions Asked!

Tags: ,


Forum Replies

  1. Hello Everyone,
    I have a question regarding the " Static VRF routes" defined under the MP-BGP section. I believe they should look like this:

    ISP(config)#ip route vrf BLUE 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 192.168.12.1
    ISP(config)#ip route vrf RED 3.3.3.3 255.255.255.255 192.168.23.3
    

    Instead of:

    ISP(config)#ip route vrf RED 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 192.168.12.1
    ISP(config)#ip route vrf BLUE 3.3.3.3 255.255.255.255 192.168.23.3
    

    Am I missing something or this is just a typo?

    Many thanks!

  2. You are absolutely correct, not sure how I ended up with that in the configs as the show output does show the correct output. It has been fixed.

  3. Sorry I am confused. Based on the show output can I confirm if the static routes are correct?

    ip route vrf BLUE 3.3.3.3 255.255.255.255 192.168.23.3
    ip route vrf RED 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 192.168.12.1
    !
    ISP#sh ip route vrf RED bgp
         3.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
    B       3.3.3.3 [20/0] via 192.168.23.3 (BLUE), 00:04:45
    B    192.168.23.0/24 is directly connected, 00:31:16, FastEthernet1/0
    ISP#sh ip route vrf BLUE bgp
    B    192.168.12.0/24 is directly connected, 00:31:24, FastEthernet0/0
         1.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
    B       1.1.1.1 [20/0] via 192.168.12.1 (RED), 00:04:53

  4. Hello Kenneth

    Looking at your output something seems to be a bit off. First of all, is the output copy and pasted exactly as it was from your output? This does not seem to be the case because the sh ip route vrf BLUE bgp output should show the routes in ascending order, so 1.1.1.1 should be first. It seems some manipulation was done. However, having said that, this once again doesn’t match up with the ip route commands shown at the beginning of your post.

    Each static route must point to the loopback of the OTHER VRF. What you’ve done is pointed them to the

    ... Continue reading in our forum

  5. Hmm

    I’m going to get Rene to take a look at this. Another set of eyes may see something that was missed…

    Laz

7 more replies! Ask a question or join the discussion by visiting our Community Forum