We're Sorry, Full Content Access is for Members Only...

If you like to keep on reading, Become a Member Now! Here is Why:

  • Learn any CCNA, CCNP and CCIE R&S Topic. Explained As Simple As Possible.
  • Try for Just $1. The Best Dollar You've Ever Spent on Your Cisco Career!
  • Full Access to our 629 Lessons. More Lessons Added Every Week!
  • Content created by Rene Molenaar (CCIE #41726)

 

409 New Members signed up the last 30 days!

satisfaction-guaranteed

100% Satisfaction Guaranteed!
You may cancel your monthly membership at any time.
No Questions Asked!

Tags: ,


Forum Replies

  1. May you pls explain same scenario adding 2 switches and 2 routers in between.

    Computer A -------Switch1-----ROUTER1------------------ROUTER 2 ---- Switch2 ----- Computer B.

    Much Thanks !!

  2. Hi Rene,

    Thanks for your reply and explanation. How about this scenario below:

    A send C an ARP request
    C send A an ARP reply
    ** C also records down A arp request information in its ARP cache, so that it does not need to send A an ARP request in the near future.

    ** - Does C does that ? or does it send a separate ARP request to A ?

  3. This is best explained with the following two captures:

    https://networklessons.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/wireshark-capture-arp-request.png

    Above you can see the ARP request. The sender (fa:16:3e:38:94:94) creates the ARP request and is looking for 192.168.12.2. It encapsulates this in an Ethernet frame with its own MAC address as the source and destination broadcast.

    Everyone on the subnet will hear this message, the device that has the destination MAC address will reply:

    //cdn-forum.networklessons.com/uploads/default/original/2X/9/9f60d1190267be572f382a

    ... Continue reading in our forum

  4. Hi.

    Router A wants to know MAC address of router B. So, it broadcasts ARP. Only router B replies.
    In this case, target MAC should be FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF which is broadcastin ARP request. Why the target MAC is all 0’s in ARP request?

  5. Thanks Lazaros, your explanation has been very useful. Now is more clear for me.

84 more replies! Ask a question or join the discussion by visiting our Community Forum