We're Sorry, Full Content Access is for Members Only...

If you like to keep on reading, Become a Member Now! Here is Why:

  • Learn any CCNA, CCNP and CCIE R&S Topic. Explained As Simple As Possible.
  • Try for Just $1. The Best Dollar You've Ever Spent on Your Cisco Career!
  • Full Access to our 588 Lessons. More Lessons Added Every Week!
  • Content created by Rene Molenaar (CCIE #41726)

 

319 New Members signed up the last 30 days!

satisfaction-guaranteed

100% Satisfaction Guaranteed!
You may cancel your monthly membership at any time.
No Questions Asked!


Forum Replies

  1. Rene,
    Great lesson however, I have questions if we have two ISPs and we would like to route traffic out through ISP-1. It means we need to set up a higher weight on the ISP-1 peering with us and setup a lower weight on the second ISP-2?
    How can we make sure traffic goes out ISP-1 and comes back in using ISP-2?
    Thanks

    Hamood

  2. Hi Rene,

    Off topic, I don't see topic conditional advertisement. Will you be adding this in future?

    thanks in advance.

    KR
    Zeeshan

  3. lee says:

    Thanks Laz, But on the diagram we have loopbacks on both R2 and R3 of 2.2.2.0/24 so as per the Router Id election process surely the router id of both R2 and R3 should be 2.2.2.2 ?

    Thanks

  4. Hello Lee

    Looking a little deeper into the issue, looking at the router configurations, the router IDs of both R2 and R3 are indeed the same as both Lo interfaces are set to 2.2.2.2. So according to BGP route selection process, if the router IDs are the same, then the router will prefer the route with the lowest neighbour IP address. So between R2 and R3, the lowest neighbour IP address is indeed 192.168.12.2, so R2 will be chosen as the path.

    So the following statement in the lesson has to be revised:

    image

    …because the Router ID is actually that of the loopback interface, but since those are the same, the neighbour IP address is used. The result is the same, but the lesson should clarify this. I will let @ReneMolenaar know about it…

    Thanks for your help!

    Laz

  5. lee says:

    Thanks Laz for clarifying that for me and the prompt response.

37 more replies! Ask a question or join the discussion by visiting our Community Forum