We're Sorry, Full Content Access is for Members Only...

If you like to keep on reading, Become a Member Now! Here is Why:

  • Learn any CCNA, CCNP and CCIE R&S Topic. Explained As Simple As Possible.
  • Try for Just $1. The Best Dollar You've Ever Spent on Your Cisco Career!
  • Full Access to our 557 Lessons. More Lessons Added Every Week!
  • Content created by Rene Molenaar (CCIE #41726)


307 New Members signed up the last 30 days!


100% Satisfaction Guaranteed!
You may cancel your monthly membership at any time.
No Questions Asked!


Notable Replies

  1. awesome lessons! didnt know you can use extended access-list like this!

    correct me if im wrong, the difference i see here is that, its working like a prefix-list but you can only use "greater than or equal to"?

    on your examples, it only shows like:

    -/24 to /32

    -/25 to /32

    -/26 to /32

    is it possible to have /24 to /30 only? /26 to /29? what will be your subnet and subnet wild card?



  2. Hi Rene/All,

    I got Problem for the attached toplogy ,R4 contains Two network 44 and 55 ,R2 at AS2 got to network 44 through R3 in AS1 ,and go to net 55 through R1 in AS1 using AS prepending in R1 and R3 the border AS Router in AS1 ,but the problem all traffic from R4 to network at r2 AS2 ,unsing source address 55 and 44 go out AS1 to AS2 through R1 the lowest Router id , my request when go to at r1 As1 with source address 44 go through r3 and to go to with sources address 55 go through R1 .,the toplogy attached.


  3. Hi Shady,

    If you want to enforce one path for outgoing traffic from AS 1 to AS 2 then it's best to influence the attributes. Don't let the router ID decide it. If you want to do this for the entire AS, it's best to configure local preference inbound on R1 and/or R3.


  4. Hi, Rene.

    I'm replicating this same scenario in GNS3 and even applying the filters to some specific routes, I lose all routes from the routing table and in the BGP table. Why is this so?

Continue the discussion forum.networklessons.com

4 more replies