We're Sorry, Full Content Access is for Members Only...

If you like to keep on reading, Become a Member Now! Here is Why:

  • Learn any CCNA, CCNP and CCIE R&S Topic. Explained As Simple As Possible.
  • Try for Just $1. The Best Dollar You've Ever Spent on Your Cisco Career!
  • Full Access to our 639 Lessons. More Lessons Added Every Week!
  • Content created by Rene Molenaar (CCIE #41726)

 

365 New Members signed up the last 30 days!

satisfaction-guaranteed

100% Satisfaction Guaranteed!
You may cancel your monthly membership at any time.
No Questions Asked!

Tags:


Forum Replies

  1. Hi Rene,

    Really enjoying the OSPF lessons! Just one query, the first output is what you had in the lesson and am just wondering why you chose the network statement for the loopback 0 as 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0, instead of 1.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 area 0, as in the second output?

    R1#show running-config | section ospf
    router ospf 1
     <strong>network 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0</strong>
     network 192.168.12.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
     
    R1#show running-config | section ospf
    router ospf 1
     network 1.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 area 0
     network 192.168.12.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
     network 192.168.12.0 0.0.0.
    ... Continue reading in our forum

  2. Within an area, the LSDB has to be same on all OSPF routers. We can’t filter LSAs within an area, the only thing we can do is to prevent a route from being installed in the routing table. That’s what we are doing here with the distribute-list.

  3. Hello Rene,
    One quick question. I am trying to use distribute-list in OSPF in outbound direction, but the command is being rejected and the below error message is showing up. Would you please describe why? Thank you so much.

    R1(config-router)#distribute-list prefix cisco out gigabitEthernet 1/0
    **% Interface not allowed with OUT in case of OSPF**
    

    Best Regards,
    Azm

  4. Hello Rene,
    Thanks for your reply. However, I still have a confusion. How does distribute-list work? does it filter LSAs or it resists routes from being installed in the routing table? Let’s say we are looking at topology like below and they are running OSPF:

    Router A------------Router B-(inbound distribute-list)---------------Router C

    Let’s say, Router C has a loopback 1.1.1.1 and it is advertised in OSPF. So if I apply an inbound distribute-list to block 1.1.1.1 on Router B, it does not install 1.1.1.1 route in its routing table. However, it passes the 1.1.1.

    ... Continue reading in our forum

  5. Hello Azm

    Yes, you are correct. The filtering that takes place is filtering of routes from entering the routing table. The filtering does not occur at the interface, but at the mechanism of adding routes to the routing table. Rene mentions the following in the lesson:

    Since the LSDB within the area has to be the same we can’t filter LSAs within the area, we can however filter routes from entering the routing table. Filtering LSAs between areas on an ABR or ASBR is no problem.

    So it is a matter of the definition of the word filter. Filtering in this case

    ... Continue reading in our forum

8 more replies! Ask a question or join the discussion by visiting our Community Forum