BGP attribute local preference is the second BGP attribute and it can be used to choose the exit path for an autonomous system. Here are the details:
- Local preference is the second BGP attribute.
- You can use local preference to choose the outbound external BGP path.
- Local preference is sent to all internal BGP routers in your autonomous system.
- Not exchanged between external BGP routers.
- Local preference is a well-known and discretionary BGP attribute.
- Default value is 100.
- The path with the highest local preference is preferred
Let me show you an example:
You can use local preference to configure your autonomous system to select a certain exit point. Instead of configuring weight on each router you can use local preference because it is exchanged on all internal BGP routers. By increasing the local preference to 800 we can make AS 1 send all traffic towards AS 2.
A well-known discretionary BGP attribute must be recognized by all BGP routers per RFC but its presence in a BGP update is optional.
Now let me show you how to configure local preference, here is the topology that we will use:
In the picture above we have two autonomous systems. R1 will advertise network 1.1.1.0/24 towards AS 2 and R4 will have to make a choice when it wants to reach this network. It can go through router R2 or R3, we’ll see how local preference influence this.
R1(config)#router bgp 1
R1(config-router)#neighbor 192.168.12.2 remote-as 2
R1(config-router)#neighbor 192.168.13.3 remote-as 2
R1(config-router)#network 1.1.1.0 mask 255.255.255.0This is the configuration of R1, nothing spectacular here.
R2(config)#interface loopback 0
R2(config-if)#ip address 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.0
R2(config)#router ospf 1
R2(config-router)#network 192.168.24.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
R2(config-router)#network 2.2.2.0 0.0.0.255 area 0R3(config)#interface loopback 0
R3(config-if)#ip address 3.3.3.3 255.255.255.0
R3(config)#router ospf 1
R3(config-router)#network 192.168.34.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
R3(config-router)#network 3.3.3.0 0.0.0.255 area 0R4(config)#interface loopback 0
R4(config-if)#ip address 4.4.4.4 255.255.255.0
R4(config)#router ospf 1
R4(config-router)#network 192.168.24.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
R4(config-router)#network 192.168.34.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
R4(config-router)#network 4.4.4.0 0.0.0.255 area 0I’ll configure OSPF within AS2 to prepare it for IBGP.
R2(config)#router bgp 2
R2(config-router)#neighbor 192.168.12.1 remote-as 1
R2(config-router)#neighbor 3.3.3.3 remote-as 2
R2(config-router)#neighbor 3.3.3.3 update-source loopback0
R2(config-router)#neighbor 4.4.4.4 remote-as 2
R2(config-router)#neighbor 4.4.4.4 update-source loopback0
R2(config-router)#neighbor 4.4.4.4 next-hop-selfR3(config)#router bgp 2
R3(config-router)#neighbor 192.168.13.1 remote-as 1
R3(config-router)#neighbor 2.2.2.2 remote-as 2
R3(config-router)#neighbor 2.2.2.2 update-source loopback0
R3(config-router)#neighbor 4.4.4.4 remote-as 2
R3(config-router)#neighbor 4.4.4.4 update-source loopback0
R3(config-router)#neighbor 4.4.4.4 next-hop-selfR4(config)#router bgp 2
R4(config-router)#neighbor 2.2.2.2 remote-as 2
R4(config-router)#neighbor 2.2.2.2 update-source loopback 0
R4(config-router)#neighbor 3.3.3.3 remote-as 2
R4(config-router)#neighbor 3.3.3.3 update-source loopback 0And above you can see the BGP configurations.
Now let’s find out what path R4 will use to reach network 1.1.1.0/24:
You can use community strings to set local preference on remote EBGP peers
Hussein,
I assume you are referring to this:
R3(config-router)#neighbor 192.168.13.1 route-map LOCALPREF inIf you switched the route-map LOCALPREF in to be route-map LOCALPREF out, then the route-map would no longer be doing anything. Essentially, this would cause R3 no longer to advertise a non-default Local Preference to R4.
The neighbor where the route-map statement being applied, is R1. R1 is in a different ASN than R3. As you may recall, the Local-Preference attribute is only sent to iBGP neighbors, so attempting to set the Local Preference attribute
... Continue reading in our forumhi,
very helpful
Thanks Laz
Let me rephrase it , I am trying to figure out why R2 stops sending updates about 1.1.1.0/24 that it receives from R1(EBGP update) to both R4 and R3 when I apply the Route-map on R3.
If I remove the rm, it starts updating
... Continue reading in our forumthanks now it is clear @lagapides