We're Sorry, Full Content Access is for Members Only...

If you like to keep on reading, Become a Member Now! Here is why:

  • Learn any CCNA, CCNP and CCIE R&S Topic. Explained As Simple As Possible.
  • Try for Just $1. The Best Dollar You've Ever Spent on Your Cisco Career!
  • Full Access to our 641 Lessons. More Lessons Added Every Week!
  • Content created by Rene Molenaar (CCIE #41726)

448 Sign Ups in the last 30 days

satisfaction-guaranteed
100% Satisfaction Guaranteed!
You may cancel your monthly membership at any time.
No Questions Asked!

Tags: , ,


Forum Replies

  1. Hi Rene,

    If we have three path to destination and we configure variance to use the three path just like in your example here :-

    https://networklessons.com/eigrp/eigrp-variance-command-example/

    My question is :-
    The traffic will be shared in which way ? to be more clarify, In the begging of this article you said " if the feasible successor has a feasible distance which is 5 times worse than the successor then traffic will be shared in a 5:1 way " so what the rate will be if we have three path to destination ( the successor and tow feasible successors ) ?

  2. Hi Hussein,

    It will be shared in proportion based on the feasible distance. If the successor had a FD of 100 and the feasible successors had a FD of 20 and 10 then you’d see a 10:2:1 ratio.

    Rene

  3. i didn’t understand this
    could you explain more details about this . that will be hard when the numbers are high .
    and i show command its show me share count

    Router#show ip route 2.2.2.2
    Routing entry for 2.2.2.0/24
      Known via "eigrp 1", distance 90, metric 156416, type internal
      Redistributing via eigrp 1
      Last update from 192.168.0.1 on FastEthernet0/0, 00:01:11 ago
      Routing Descriptor Blocks:
        192.168.0.1, from 192.168.0.1, 00:01:11 ago, via FastEthernet0/0
          Route metric is 156416, traffic share count is 240
          Total delay is 5110 microseconds
    ... Continue reading in our forum

  4. Hello Florain

    The FS is a FS only if it is not in the routing table. If it is in the routing table it has the best metric and is thus considered a successor, even if there are more than one such as is the case with EIGRP load balancing.

    ... Continue reading in our forum

55 more replies! Ask a question or join the discussion by visiting our Community Forum