You are here: Home » EIGRP

EIGRP Unequal Cost Load Balancing

Just like OSPF or RIP, EIGRP can do load balancing but it has one more trick in its hat. RIP and OSPF both can do load-balancing but the paths have to be equal.

EIGRP can do something cool…unequal load-balancing! Even better it will share traffic in a proportional way, if you have a feasible successor that has a feasible distance which is 5 times worse than the successor then traffic will be shared in a 5:1 way.

Let’s take a look at an example of how EIGRP can do load balancing:

We’ll view this topology from R1’s perspective. Let’s fill in the successor, feasible successor, advertised and feasible distance in a table. If you have no idea how this works please read my introduction to EIGRP first.

	Advertised Distance	Feasible distance
R2	15	20
R3	10	15	SUCCESSOR
R4	14	114	FEASIBLE SUCCESSOR

This is our first example where we found out the successor and feasible successor. If you look at the routing table you will only find the successor there. Now we are going to change things so we’ll see the feasible successor in the routing table as well so it will load-balance.

You can do this by using the variance command. The variance command works as a multiplier:

We're Sorry, Full Content Access is for Members Only...

If you like to keep on reading, Become a Member Now! Here is why:

Learn any CCNA, CCNP and CCIE R&S Topic. Explained As Simple As Possible.
Try for Just $1. The Best Dollar You've Ever Spent on Your Cisco Career!
Full Access to our 642 Lessons. More Lessons Added Every Week!
Content created by Rene Molenaar (CCIE #41726)

Give Membership a try - it's just $1 ►

470 Sign Ups in the last 30 days

100% Satisfaction Guaranteed!
You may cancel your monthly membership at any time.
No Questions Asked!

Previous Lesson
EIGRP Hold Time and Hello Packets

Next Lesson
EIGRP Variance Command Example

Tags: Load Balancing, Successor, Variance

Forum Replies

hussien.samer says:

Hi Rene,

If we have three path to destination and we configure variance to use the three path just like in your example here :-

https://networklessons.com/eigrp/eigrp-variance-command-example/

My question is :-
The traffic will be shared in which way ? to be more clarify, In the begging of this article you said " if the feasible successor has a feasible distance which is 5 times worse than the successor then traffic will be shared in a 5:1 way " so what the rate will be if we have three path to destination ( the successor and tow feasible successors ) ?
ReneMolenaar says:

Hi Hussein,

It will be shared in proportion based on the feasible distance. If the successor had a FD of 100 and the feasible successors had a FD of 20 and 10 then you’d see a 10:2:1 ratio.

Rene

i didn’t understand this
could you explain more details about this . that will be hard when the numbers are high .
and i show command its show me share count

Router#show ip route 2.2.2.2
Routing entry for 2.2.2.0/24
  Known via "eigrp 1", distance 90, metric 156416, type internal
  Redistributing via eigrp 1
  Last update from 192.168.0.1 on FastEthernet0/0, 00:01:11 ago
  Routing Descriptor Blocks:
    192.168.0.1, from 192.168.0.1, 00:01:11 ago, via FastEthernet0/0
      Route metric is 156416, traffic share count is 240
      Total delay is 5110 microseconds

... Continue reading in our forum

azmuddincisco says:

Thanks a lot…you the man…

Azm
lagapides says:

Hello Florain

https://cdn-forum.networklessons.com/user_avatar/forum.networklessons.com/florianl/40/381_1.png
florianl:

he FS normally is not inserted in the routing table, only the successor route can be found there.

The FS is a FS only if it is not in the routing table. If it is in the routing table it has the best metric and is thus considered a successor, even if there are more than one such as is the case with EIGRP load balancing.

https://cdn-forum.networklessons.com/user_avatar/forum.networklessons.com/florianl/40/381_1.png
florianl:

If you do
... Continue reading in our forum

55 more replies! Ask a question or join the discussion by visiting our Community Forum