We're Sorry, Full Content Access is for Members Only...

If you like to keep on reading, Become a Member Now! Here is why:

  • Learn any CCNA, CCNP and CCIE R&S Topic. Explained As Simple As Possible.
  • Try for Just $1. The Best Dollar You've Ever Spent on Your Cisco Career!
  • Full Access to our 651 Lessons. More Lessons Added Every Week!
  • Content created by Rene Molenaar (CCIE #41726)

445 Sign Ups in the last 30 days

100% Satisfaction Guaranteed!
You may cancel your monthly membership at any time.
No Questions Asked!

Tags: ,

Forum Replies

  1. why would u need to run more than 1 routing protocol in your network. wouldn’t you either run in todays world purely eigrp or ospf? why both?

  2. Hi Ruby,

    If you design a network, you will always use one routing protocol (if possible). Here are some scenarios where you might have to use two routing protocols:

    • You are migrating your company network with the network from another company. Maybe you are running OSPF and they are running EIGRP. As a temporary solution you could use redistribution and run both protocols.
    • You run OSPF on your internal network and are installing a new site. Your SP offers you a MPLS VPN connection but only supports BGP as the routing protocol.
    • You use EIGRP on your network b
    ... Continue reading in our forum

  3. Thanks Laz, it kind of helps by giving me a basic concept.

  4. I would add when it comes to more specific routes, for example a router learns from OSPF (AD 110) and from RIP (AD 120), the router will choose the more specific route, so the RIP one, despite it has a higher (worse) AD .
    So, if we want to reach the host from this router, it will use the /25 route from RIP.

  5. Hello Juan,

    The key thing to remember is that AD only applies when you have two exact routes. and are not the same routes.


12 more replies! Ask a question or join the discussion by visiting our Community Forum