We're Sorry, Full Content Access is for Members Only...

If you like to keep on reading, Become a Member Now! Here is Why:

  • Learn any CCNA, CCNP and CCIE R&S Topic. Explained As Simple As Possible.
  • Try for Just $1. The Best Dollar You've Ever Spent on Your Cisco Career!
  • Full Access to our 641 Lessons. More Lessons Added Every Week!
  • Content created by Rene Molenaar (CCIE #41726)


391 New Members signed up the last 30 days!


100% Satisfaction Guaranteed!
You may cancel your monthly membership at any time.
No Questions Asked!

Tags: , ,

Forum Replies

  1. What’s the name of the follow-up lesson? “In another lesson I will give you a configuration example how to implement this on a Cisco Catalyst Switch.”

    Or does it not yet exist?

  2. Hi Rene,
    Which’s standard of RFC that I can follow when learning the TACACS+?
    Many thanks!

  3. Hello Thinh

    The original TACACS is defined in RFC 1492 as it is an open IETF standard. TACACS+ however was developed by Cisco so it has no corresponding RFC. Cisco developed it as an open standard so many vendors can and do use it.

    There is however a Cisco RFC TACACS+ Draft available on the IETF web site that you can check out. There are also additional drafts that have been added, the most recent of which can be found here.

    I hope this has been helpful!


  4. oh, thank you so much, i looked it out :slight_smile:

  5. Hello

    Can you please explain what you mean at the beginning of the lesson, that port security cannot prevent the connection of a Wi-Fi router to the switch? Could not we just configure the switch to accept only specific MAC addresses on its interfaces via port security? How is NAT also affecting the whole process? Thank you in advance!


4 more replies! Ask a question or join the discussion by visiting our Community Forum