Spanning-Tree BPDUGuard

Spanning-tree BPDUguard is one of the features that helps you protect your spanning-tree topology. Let me give you an example:

spanning tree fake bpdu

In my topology above we have a perfectly working spanning tree topology. By default spanning tree will send and receive BPDUs on all interfaces. In our example we have a computer on the fa0/2 interface of SW2. Someone with curious hostile intentions could start a tool that generates BPDUs with a superior bridge ID. What’ll happen is that our switches will believe that the root bridge can now be reached through SW2 and we’ll have a spanning tree re-calculation. Doesn’t sound like a good idea right? Here’s what could go wrong:

spanning tree mitm

You could even do a man in the middle attack without anyone knowing. Imagine I connect my computer to two switches. If I become the root bridge all traffic from SW1 or SW3 towards SW2 will flow through me. I’ll run Wireshark and wait till the magic happens.

We can use BPDUGuard to prevent this from happening as it will block BPDUs:

spanning tree bpdu guard active

BPDUguard will ensure that when we receive a BPDU on an interface that the interface will go into err-disable mode.

Let’s take a look how to configure this…

We're Sorry, Full Content Access is for Members Only...

If you like to keep on reading, Become a Member Now! Here is why:

  • Learn any CCNA, CCNP and CCIE R&S Topic. Explained As Simple As Possible.
  • Try for Just $1. The Best Dollar You’ve Ever Spent on Your Cisco Career!
  • Full Access to our 740 Lessons. More Lessons Added Every Week!
  • Content created by Rene Molenaar (CCIE #41726)

538 Sign Ups in the last 30 days

satisfaction-guaranteed
100% Satisfaction Guaranteed!
You may cancel your monthly membership at any time.
No Questions Asked!

Tags:


Forum Replies

  1. awesome explaination Renee .
    I really enjoy reading your topics and make me feel more confortable and confident when I learn it
    thanks

  2. Hi Rene,

    I am more curious if STP will send BPDUs on Access ports enabled with Portfast or this will be out of the STP topology, Let be more specific with my query

    In case i have 2 SWs running RSTP a third SW is introduced which happens to be not supporting STP and is connected to my 2 Sws with portfast enabled

    In case BPDUs is being sent on portfast then i assume BPDUGuard will save the day for me on the 2nd SW as it will shut down the port once it receives BPDU on its access port, Is this correct?

     

     

     

     

  3. Hi Ahmed,

    Enabling portfast doesn’t disable STP and the interface will still send BPDUs. Take a look at this post:

    https://networklessons.com/spanning-tree/does-portfast-disable-spanning-tree/

    In your example, you shouldn’t enable portfast on interfaces that connect to other switches. Only use this for “end” devices like computers, laptops, servers, etc. In your case, BPDUguard will ensure that the interface will go down.

    Mixing PVST and rapid PVST is no problem btw, they are compatible.

    Rene

  4. Thanks Rene, The point here is usually you don’t know the end host capability, I saw cases loop can happen from a server with NIC bridging without STP capability.

    Just wanted to make sure Portfast + BPDUGuard can address this case

     

     

31 more replies! Ask a question or join the discussion by visiting our Community Forum